Archive for the 1 Brain Category

Level 7 (watched 6/16/14)

Posted in 1 Brain, Should've been 45 minutes with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 06/17/2014 by schlockfest

If it weren’t already difficult enough to be my friend, I make some poor schlocker choose a movie from a pile of “films” I’ve pre-selected, that way they can take the fall when things turn out like they did tonight. The only thing worse than the movie tonight was that Pat had to take the fall for selecting it (He’s pretty much the nicest one among us). Crissy passed on it two weeks ago, Luke saw a brighter future in Happy Birthday to Me, but Pat was brave enough to stand in front of the projector tonight and say ” I choose this one. I choose the mutated zombie people from North Carolina, and here’s your awesome spicy pineapple tequila drink.”

IMG_8069

Just talking about life during the apocalypse, again.

I need to preface this review by saying not only are we extremely supportive of independent cinema (I mean some of my closest friends make films), but we have a BIG appreciation for what it takes to make a movie, even a crappy one. But if you’re reading this, and thinking about making a film, here’s the biggest piece of advice I can give: Less is more. Level 7 is a whopping 110 minutes long and about 70 minutes too long at that. We spent a lot of the film wondering why we had to see the previous 3-4 minutes of footage. For instance, if you’re getting in a car I don’t need to know that you took the keys from your purse, put them in the door, pulled the handle, took the keys out of the door, put them in the ignition, turned the keys, well you get the idea. Some of this shit is implied! And if your mom leaves you to babysit your younger sibling (who’s probably in college) they ain’t gonna give you their cell phone number (yup, that happened).

In between making fun of the movie, which is what we do best, the schlockers faces portrayed a sort of ambivalence about life in general while they stared at the screen. I believe a couple of them were pondering if this feeling was equivalent to purgatory. At 40 minutes in we took a unanimous vote to move it up to 1.5x speed. And a collective sigh of relief was felt when we realized the credits took up the final 8 minutes.

IMG_8074

“How did she drown??? She’s so buoyant!”

Was the movie really that bad? Ummmmm, No. Should they have made room in the budget for a tripod? Yes. (and no this was not a Blair Witch/ Cloverfield aesthetic). Were there a lot of special effects including gore, condom like intestines, gun shots, and runaway extras from The Walking Dead? Yes. Did you have to wade through a shit ton of dialogue that didn’t advance “the plot” or sound realistic outside of a porno? Yes.

All in all the first half hour of the movie was a testament to how awesome my fellow schlockers are. We laughed, made fun of each other, made fun of the movie, and made fun of Jake. But then the round of drinks ran out, and the chips started to scrape at the bottom of a dish which once held BLT dip (you don’t wanna know how awesome this stuff was), and nothing short of a porno slaughter, Bruce Campbell cameo, hundred dollar bill falling out of the case could have saved this mess. We REALLY, REALLY, REALLY wanted to like this movie, but in the end there was just too much to love.

1/5 leopard tattoos

What it has: a cautionary statement about breast implants, overdoses, sex through underwear, expensive cars, wheelchair victim, false ending, a great premise, nuevo Japan, lotsa guns, a feel for small town Carolina, and a need for a good editor.

What it’s missing: natural dialogue, virgins, outtakes as main footage (there were some nice moments there), and confidence in the viewer to read between the lines

Drink of the night:

Escort through Purgatory

4 parts tequila

1 part agave nectar

6 parts pineapple juice

tabasco to taste

squeeze of lime

cilantro to taste

Serve over ice.

Night of the Living Dorks (watched 3/24/10)

Posted in 1 Brain with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 03/30/2010 by schlockfest

I remember a joke about an optimist. It’s about a kid digging in a room full of shit, and when his parents ask him why he responds “Well, with all this shit there’s gotta be a pony in here somewhere.” I’m beginning to feel like I’m looking for that pony, and Night of the Living Dorks was just another clump of manure flying over my shoulder. The fear is that tomorrow night won’t be filled with the clomping of hooves or even a couple of coconuts clanging together.

... and no you'll never be Bruce Campbell

It of course is compared to Shaun of the Dead. But it seems really any movie that has a zombie in it and makes you chuckle gets compared to Shaun of the Dead. Just like for years any movie with a zombie in it was the next Night of the Living Dead. It doesn’t have to be that way. In fact it’s more reasonable to say American Pie didn’t need to be remade with zombies in it and worse actors. It’s even better to say “those are classics, stop fucking with my hopes.” Where NOTLDorks gets it’s 5.8 on IMDB is beyond me. “It’s a crapfest that could only be worse if JLo was in it” to quote some member of schlockfest who I was too brain dead to acknowledge.

Don’t watch it. Too many corneas were harmed in our screening already. It’s not the worst piece of schlock I’ve ever witnessed, but it’s not worth passing over all the amateur porn or Youtube videos of kids screaming on rollercoasters on the internet. Here, in fact, watch this instead. I promise you’ll like it better.

What’s it have: Teen love, virgins, elixirs, hot teachers, students, preps, German hipsters, subtitles, dubbed version, oh did I mention cliches, an overrated IMDB rating, a negative impact on producers pocketbook

What it’s missing: Well, if you’re looking for a box of crap, it’s not missing a thing.

For the love of Shaun of the Dead… skip it.

1/5 needlessly long alternate endings

Zombie Honeymoon (watched 3/17/10)

Posted in 1 Brain with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 03/23/2010 by schlockfest

I first caught a snippet of this on Fearnet.com and stopped watching 5 minutes into it thinking this would make a good schlock night movie. What I missed, and Jake would later, so aptly, point out is that: the movie really isn’t about zombies. It’s about cannibals! It should be called Cannibal Honeymoon… geez, get your monsters right.

... but we always go to Jack in the Box.

Regardless of the cannibal/zombie argument it was better suited to be a Lifetime movie about relationships. The emotional pain of loving someone who destroys everything around you. Your frantic attempts to cover up for all their indiscretions. The time spent convincing yourself it’s not that bad. It’s all there. And somehow it sounds so good on paper, but it just doesn’t translate to the screen. I have no idea why this movie didn’t work, not really. (Hey pssssssttt… y’all asleep yet?)

However, the night did end in a serious bout of laughing, but I don’t think we can attribute it to Zombie Honeymoon. In fact we decided “the ones upstairs” watching RomComs would have gotten more enjoyment out of it. Though “the ones upstairs” disagreed vehemently, insisting it didn’t have Hugh Grant in it. In fact that’s what this movie came down to: a debate about Hugh Grant, and the last thing any self respecting schlocker wants is a debate about Hugh Grant in their house.

What it has: travel agents (do those even exist?),cannibals, black goop, lots of relationship issues, really bad bedside manner, vegan women vs. carnivorous men, skin teasers, death, panties, arguing, marital strife, honeymoon strife, relationship strife, and viewer strife

What it’s missing: zombies (particularly important since their in the title), a plausible reason for the “zombie’s” death, a coupon in the box for a six pack

Though the movie itself isn’t much to write about it did break a long streak of movies we were having trouble laughing at. It succeeds on that level, offering itself up as a punching bag for jokes. The laughing at factor is the main factor in it’s “high” rating. There’s probably better one’s out there to laugh with, but make sure you have a group to rip on this one with if you watch it.

1.5/5 Steve Szymanski’s

Blood Night: The Legend of Mary Hatchet (watched 12/30/09)

Posted in 1 Brain, Should've been 45 minutes with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 01/13/2010 by schlockfest

For the final schlock of 2009 we flipped a coin. The contenders were Cat in the Brain and Blood Night. It came up heads. Blood Night was our last schlock of ’09. We pinned some high hopes on it for several reasons. Blood night is the inaugural film of an idependent director that seemed to have a rather promising production value. It seemed to have the spirit and maybe even the story for some classic schlock. By the end of the night we were wishing the coin had come up tails.

The first five minutes have you believing. The feel of the shots, the storyline that’s developing, even the actors. Then it feels like that footage was passed on, ripped into Final Cut and placed piecemeal into into the The Legend of the The Legend of Mary Hatchet. After the next 35 minutes I believe Jake’s actual words were “….naked pirhouetteing lesbian werewolves with dildo launching cannons who are abducted by aliens and sent to work in a porn mine couldn’t save this movie”. Though I can’t totally agree with him there it didn’t happen so it’s a moot point. The movie only improved marginally, and at that it wasn’t enough to save the protracted and wearisome second beginning that would only appeal to teenage virgins who had never seen a movie.

The problem certainly wasn’t the story. Separate from what it was made into it seemed to be teeming with potential. The focus however was shedding insight into the lives of the teenagers that start dropping faster than their one liners. For instance they spent a whole scene setting up the punch line to a pun joke.  If the joke was a headline it would have read Mouse tattoo on thigh disappears, may have been eaten by slang vagina. No it’s not a spoiler. You may not have been awake at that point to hear it.

The second half of the movie goes off pretty predictably (though there is a well shot scissor through the head during sex scene which gives you a brief glimmer of hope). I won’t spoil it for you in case you decide to take it upon yourself to prove me wrong, however for the sake of your eyes I wouldn’t advise it. But I will say those kills weren’t very inspired and the movie does have some cuts, which make some of the actors teleport (technically).

What it has: actual movie in movie footage from a projector of Attack of the Killer Tomatoes (highlight), a striptease in front of said projector (letdown), Ouji board, bad margaritas, extra budget for blood at the end

What it’s missing: naked pirhouetteing lesbian werewolves with dildo launching cannons who are abducted by aliens and sent to work in a porn mine (hopefully they’ll add this into the blu ray)

High hopes. Good Start. Agonizing Journey.

1.5/5 menstraul cramps

Zombie Strippers (3/11/09)

Posted in 1 Brain with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 08/13/2009 by schlockfest

Do I have the right to review this movie? Probably not. Why? Because halfway through we decided to put it on 1.5 speed in hopes the credits would come faster. The only reason it lost the dead last position to The Mad is because we spent less time with it. I know exactly what you’re thinking, and we picked it off the shelf for the same reason. Boobs + Zombies, there’s at least gotta be a good laugh and with Jenna Jameson there’s a semblance of a budget to get it there. Wrong. Well the budget was there.

What it has: Zombies, A Big Budget, Strippers, Guns, Flying Money, and a Stagnant Night Club Backdrop

What it doesn’t have: Shlock

That’s what makes this one difficult. When you have a million bucks to spend on a movie it’s hard to make shlock unless you’ve made that million bucks off your previous shlock. It’s like a trustee with dreadlocks, you wanna like it, but when you get below the surface the roots just are not there. So maybe I’m faulting it for it’s big name (Jenna) and it’s big budget. But I had high hopes for this one…

You can hate my review but there was a mixed group of 10 of us watching this one, and there were more moans and groans than the film had to offer. If you’re 13, scrambled Skinamax has more to offer, if you’re over 18 get high and watch Sesame Street instead. However if you’re looking for a B-grade zombie and stripper fun check out Strippers Vs. Zombies. It at least has some heart, and you can find it’s review in the 2 Brain Category…

1/5 Stripper Poles

The Mad (watched 8/5/09)

Posted in 1 Brain with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 08/06/2009 by schlockfest

First off you have to understand we enter schlock night with low expectations, however it was a unanimous decision that “The Mad” was by far the most painful movie of schlock night. Don’t let it’s 5 minute quirky song intro get your hopes up, like it did ours. The intro was simply so it could break the 80 minute barrier. It was a dialogue-fest, and it’s writer and special effects budget was blown on Billy Zane. Had we researched any further on IMDB we might have found this “A Father-Daughter Feel Good Zombie Film”. Unfortunately this wasn’t tongue in cheek. In retrospect it’s funny to describe the movie, but really you could discuss the whole film having watched the trailer.

Highlights from the movie do include a discussion on how to kill zombies, and the closing credits.

Suggestions for improvements: replace Billy Zane with Henry Rollins, have a sex scene with anyone but cows

Spare yourself. .5 (that’s half)/5 Brains