Archive for the 2 Brains Category

Midnight Movie (watched 11/17/09)

Posted in 2 Brains with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 11/19/2009 by schlockfest

Apropos to it’s title I started this one at the correct hour. To say I wasn’t expecting much out of Midnight Movie would be an understatement. It has the canned acting that you would expect from a first run B-grade and carries with it the expectation the characters will explain the plot to you like a kindergartner tying their shoelaces for the first time.  And though it never blew me away, it never went into the trenches of my expectations. In fact there were even some subtle contexts that if you weren’t paying attention might fly under the radar.

 

The premise for Midnight Movie is a group of characters watching a movie that a supernatural psychopath uses as a portal to enter the “real” world. So really you’re watching two movies. The acting and filmmaking of the movie the characters are watching is actually a lot of fun. Secondly, it’s pretty much an outright homage to Texas Chainsaw Massacre and manages to poke fun using a reincarnation of Norman Bates as Mrs. Bates (at least that’s how I saw it).

I’d be hard pressed to say there is anything scary about the movie, and the lack of character development meant there wasn’t much lag time. The infamous screeching metal sound that seems to infect modern horror movies is the only audio effect at setting the mood. (Though arguable more homage than effect). The kills are pretty generic once you witness the first one, as the killer always uses his “custom crafted” spiral of doom.

Overall it was a decent time, but I think there was a lot of potential here. In other words they could have made it smarter, and after watching Midnight Movie I felt the director was capable of it. Unfortunately they didn’t take it that far, but fortunately they didn’t stab me in the eye with what they were doing either.

It had: fun special effects, stereotyped characters, Liver soccer, plenty of plot holes, a decent ending, an opportunity for a sequel, and plenty of campy excitement

It doesn’t have: too much explaining (thankfully), a thriving independent theatre, a way out, or a detailed backstory

I did watch this one alone so I don’t know how much laugh factor was there, but it did keep me awake until 1:30.

2.5/5 shots to the body

 

A Boy and His Dog (Watched 9/09/09)

Posted in 2 Brains with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 09/10/2009 by schlockfest

“Once again, into the breach we go.” That could be a new Schlock night motto. Maybe the review of this movie should start with a disclaimer: The final rating of this film receives one brain for the telepathic dog, and one brain for the ending. There’s a half brain that can go either way because of the catchy theme song. The song certainly sticks with you, (a plus if you’re Jake. A minus if you’re Jake’s significant other.)boyanddog

The best we could figure at the end of this movie was they had a premise and an end in mind, and then they went on a journey to put something in the middle. Then I found out today it was based on a novella. And they left out things like injecting Blood (the dog) with dolphin spinal fluid. It was brilliant on some levels, painfully slow in others. 5/9 of us stayed awake the whole time.

What the movie has: A whole lot of a boy and his dog walking; a subterranean, caucasian, face-painting, robot breeding society; an underground sunrise; schlock within schlock; an evil woman who tempts men; and oh yeah, a sperm sucking machine

What it doesn’t have: A suave protagonist (“Why’d they have to cut her? She could have been used two or three more times”); A female character that isn’t an evil manipulator (though given the context of the film you can see why)

So given that it has a 6.6/10 on IMDB should you go watch it? Flip a coin. If it’s tails skip it, if it’s heads consider it. There’s definitely some merit here, and the end of the movie did get a laugh from those of us awake. There’s no doubt it has some fucked up moments. If you have real issues with misogyny do yourself a favor and pass. If you’re looking for a crowd pleaser and a good time I’d start somewhere else.

2.5/5 Test Tubes of Sperm

Gory, Gory Hallelujah! (Watched 8/26/09)

Posted in 2 Brains with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 08/27/2009 by schlockfest

I’m still not sure where to start. I’m actually still not sure what happened last night. I know we started this movie. I know their remake of “Glory Glory Hallelujah” as an opening number had us laughing. But about they time the lead actors took off on motorcycles against a tie dye background it gets a little fuzzy. In fact I’m pretty sure this may have been a CIA attempt at hypnosis and subliminal thought implantation. At the end I was scared. I looked over to find one friend perturbed that his nap had been disturbed (running theme) and the other trying to figure out how he had just been Yes. Really.violated.

His mouth agape in abject horror. He said “that movie was like the dirty condom you wake up to find hanging out of you.” Was it consensual? How did happen? It even made you wonder if your bed was actually your bed. This movie had an assortment of everything: Lesbian witch covens, devil preachers, angry elvises, dildo of the Armageddon, and stereotypes of parodies of stereotypes of real life.

Were we entertained? 2 /3 of us certainly were. Could any of us tell you what the movie was about or anything that happened? No. Absolutely not. And if I could I probably wouldn’t tell you, because really, there are no expectations to have for this movie.  It was written by it’s producer, director, and main actor. It’s credits were shorter than a rolodex entry. And surprisingly it succeeded in inflicting more mental trauma than Martyrs, even though Gory Gory should be rated PG-13.

Can I recommend it? It’s a niche movie for sure. And if you do drugs (lots of them) it would probably make it more interesting… though it may permanently affect your mental state. But in the end, yes, there were zombies.

2.5/5 Corkscrews to the Penis

Strippers vs. Zombies: Zombies! Zombies! Zombies! (watched 3/11/09)

Posted in 2 Brains with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 08/11/2009 by schlockfest

Add pimp to the title and then it really would say it all. The synopsis can be read here, but you really don’t need add much else to the title to get the plot. We held a zombie and stripper event for this night (unfortunately not as action packed as we’d hoped) with a double feature of Zombie Strippers. Hands down this was the better movie. Most likely the entire movie was shot in one night, possibly all on the same tape. But it has character, and that’s worth something when you have 10 people to laugh at it. The most memorable character has to be Johnny “Backhand” Vegas the “heroic” pimp that goes around, you guessed it, backhanding all the zombies. Unless you’re a big Emanuelle fan you probably won’t recognize any of the actors, and even if you are you may not. It’s low budget there’s no doubt, and it certainly won’t make any appearances in your Feminist Literature class, however it has all the feel of a couple of peeps who really love the genre creating. Strippers Vs. Zombie has heart, but not that stupid RomCom silly fairy princess heart. Just ask Johnny. If you have the sense of humor and a lively group it’s worth the stab.

Writer’s revelation: I was reading some of the reviews of this moving and people were faulting it for: having pink blood, using the word “strippers” to sell the movie, and an overall low budget. 1)If you have a crappy budget, you have a crappy budget. It’s not your fault. 2)If you’re special effects are going to suck you might as well make them really suck… as in pink blood 3) If you expect a movie to be good because it has Boobs, Strippers, Cocks, or sex in the title… well I’ve got some bad news for you…

Rating: 2.5/5 Backhands

My Name is Bruce (Watched 2/11/09)

Posted in 2 Brains with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 08/08/2009 by schlockfest

Bruce Campbell has a well established seat in the B-Grade hall of fame. His chiseled face defines hero as much as his ability to say boomstick with a straight face. If there was a zombie crisis there’s no one you’d rather turn to except maybe Max Brooks, except Bruce has shown us how to kick ass not just told us. Really in our collective apocalyptic minds there could be nothing better than a couple of fringe teenagers seeking out Bruce to do exactly that in real life. (That’s the premise for the movie). The budget for this movie is there. And if you worship Bruce there’s plenty of inside jokes to keep you going. However if you haven’t seen Evil Dead then back away from My Name is Bruce and add Maniac Cop to your stack while you’re at it. What isn’t in the movie is a horde of zombies (only the monster Guan Di, who has a catchy theme song that will stick in your head) or a chainsaw. FOR THE LOVE OF BRUCE… how do you have a Bruce tribute film (what this truly is) without a freakin’ chainsaw?!?!

We certainly had a good time watching My Name is Bruce. I would have to say though, if I was going to throw it in again I’d probably reach for Army of Darkness, Evil Dead (1 or 2), or even Bubba Ho-Tep first. Maybe Sam Raimi’s return to our side of the fence will bring about another collaborative classic…

2.5/5 smoking boomsticks (If only because our expectations were so high)